Law firms The reading done by morning, and the files never leave the firm.
Built for a profession where privilege is a duty — and a public AI tool is a risk, not a shortcut.
Document review
Reads hundreds of files without hundreds of chances to be wrong.
Every line in the review points at the clause it came from.
What isn't in the document is marked missing, not filled in from imagination.
The output is a draft for a lawyer — not a replacement for one.
Answers with the source attached
Answers against the firm's own files and policies.
Every claim is checked against the document it came from — before it is said.
Nothing in the files? NOT_FOUND. Not a legal-sounding guess.
A contradiction between documents comes to the table, both sides shown.
Privilege, built in
AI that's allowed to meet client files.
The engine runs inside a project the firm owns. Privileged material doesn't travel to a public tool.
Entitlements are enforced before retrieval — if you aren't cleared for a file, the file doesn't exist for you.
Unlike medicine, there is no cap here. Summarizing a case file is permitted use, and the engine runs at full depth.
“What's our position in similar matters?”
If it isn't in the ingested files, it says so, and lists what was checked. Knowing what's missing beats receiving a guess.
The material doesn't leave
The engine and the documents live in one project, owned by the firm. We hold no copy.
It doesn't invent
A claim with no clause behind it doesn't get written. Not a policy — the structure.
The lawyer stays accountable
The tool prepares, cites and flags. The opinion belongs to a person. Built that way on purpose.